SP took cognizance on the application sent by President and DGP

Bhaskar News | A departmental investigation has started on Arwal

police officer Sushil Kujur, who has been at Kinjar police station. It is worth noting that an application was sent to the President and DGP by Deepak Kumar, a resident of Cyber ​​Security Expert, Kochhasa village. In which he was accused of writing wrong diary and attaching fake CDR court, in which Deepak has given several avidenths that in Kinjar Case No: 27/12 several mercury Kinjar Case No: 14/12 were written. The same CDR is given fake and fake, a certificate of 65 (B) has not been given for its credibility. Some CDR is in the increasing order of time, but the CDR given by the police is sometimes increasing, sometimes there is no details of the message delivery on which nabar. Which telecom company does not have a description of when the CDR is given by which email. CDR is also not discussed in the police diary. The same Sushil Kujur has testified in the court and has not been able to recognize CDR. A few days ago, Sushil Kujur has also sought written apology from the court in the case of writing wrong diary. But the question is starting to arise when the police is unable to recognize the CDR in its own case, then how will the court get another victim. Cyber ​​Security Expert Deepak Kumar is accused of abusing several police stations, including SP, as well as demanding obstructing government work and extortion. The testimony has been closed from both sides, the police is on the argument, the statement of two witnesses Aslam Ali and Sushil Kujur has been made in the court. Deepak said that the police has not been able to present the witnesses in the court. On the day the police showed the incident, I was giving the exam of UPSC Civil Services in Delhi. There is no call message in the CDR given by the police. Aslam Ali was suspended on my report.

What in this case advocate Arwal Court advocate Akhilesh Singh said that a police officer in 65B when a police officer in CDR, screenshot, photo, video, audio court If attached, he has to give a certificate of the Electronics Evidence Act 65 (B) that there is no tampering-tampering and collecting evidence from the original resources. If necessary, we will present the original digital device, if I am found to be torn apart, it will be my responsibility. If the police does not get a certificate, then the accused benefits. In the law itself, XGBit Term witness collects police evidence under the evidence or CRPC 91 given by the police diary. The sequence is in the form of 1,2,3. If there is no evidence XGBT, then there is no value of that evidence.